Origins of World War II – The Unexpected Views of Four Key Diplomats Who Were Close to Events

sheep_war2Here is a very interesting collection of quotes, facts and figures concerning the origins of World War II which I am certain that no one will have been taught in school, nor seen in any documentaries on the “History Channel”.  The list was compiled by Jason Collett, whom I do not know, but wish to thank, and these were published by  Due to the length, I have only included about half of his list of quotes.

Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war.” (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952, p129).

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands .. when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe .. It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign .. no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries.. Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps .. President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany understandable. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews..among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews..the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin, ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself.” (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Anti-Semitic? The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.  Follow the money!

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson “A History of the Modern World” (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that “Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.” (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

“As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class, reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.”  (Koestler The God that Failed p 28)

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144): “It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed and lavishly displayed by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.”

A book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, “Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.” But she adds “Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their ‘race’. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents.” etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. “Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.” (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes “In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.”


Documents of German Foreign Policy (German White Book) Click to enlarge

Hitler and Britain - German Whitebook

Winston Churchill: “You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.” Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill – His Career in War and Peace, p. 145

So here we have further evidence that World War II,  just as in the previous war, was about Anti-Germanism and it was being fomented and financed by a distinct clique of international terrorists, usurpers of sovereign nations, and genocidal maniacs.

Hitler said: “It is the people who are at home both nowhere and everywhere, who do not have anywhere a soil on which they have grown up, but who live in Berlin today, in Brussels tomorrow, Paris the day after that.”

And no, he was NOT talking about the owners of the little Jewish Deli or butcher shop down the street. He was talking about the International Bankster Gangsters, Market Speculators,  plutocrats, and their globalist minions!  Do we not also see this very thing going today in any number of countries around the world today?  Where countries are being demonized, then destroyed, occupied, raped, pillaged, populations slaughtered,  all under the pretext of “stopping an evil dictator” and “freedom, liberty and democracy”?

Hitler also said: “As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian, I have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they have only for their wages wretchedness and misery. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people are plundered and exposed.”

Were those Anti-Jewish sentiments?  Was it “hate” directed at some innocent, powerless minority? Or was it a reasonable and moral response to the policies and effects of Anti-Germanism, political usurpation, cultural theft and destruction, global financial tyranny, slavery, poverty and hunger (genocide) ….and a sincere desire for truth, freedom, peace and social justice?

What did Hitler say when he came to power in 1933?  Read it for yourself!

The New Germany Desires Work and Peace!

This entry was posted in Germany, Great Britain, Hitler, National Socialism, United Kingdom, USA, Word War I, World War II and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Origins of World War II – The Unexpected Views of Four Key Diplomats Who Were Close to Events

  1. Justice for Germans, please says:

    Great, great work, J4G. Keep it up. I very much look forward to again listening to you being interviewed by Deanna Spingola.

  2. Markus says:

    All these people of influence, who knew the truth, yet did little to propagate it, must have felt horrible seeing their countries go to war against the noble and reasonable Germans.

    No wonder, Churchill for example was an alcoholic. But he is treated like royalty by the court historians. He even got a state funural like a member of the British royals. No other British politician ever got that in history!

    Reading Churchill’s quotes though, is so revealing. He quasi-openly states many times that Germany was right about everything and that Hitler was peace loving and spot on on the Jewish elite conspiray, but he destroyed Germany anyways by sacrificing the British Empire.

    That attitude is actually what he is celebrated for, being a complete sell-out and war criminal, a bipolar monster.

  3. Reblogged this on murderbymedia and commented:
    The most lied about war EVER!!

  4. monio says:

    I do not know whether it was “the most lied about war ever”. Each epoch has its own “modern history”. To the French who lived in the 2nd half of the XV century, “modern history” was the “Hundred Years War”; to the Germans of the 2nd half of the XVII century, “modern history” was the “Thirty Years War”; to Romans living under Emperor Claudius, “modern history” was the time of Emperor Caligula… And every single time it is the “modern history” which is the most lied about. And it is so, because in each and every case it is the “modern history” which determines the “balance of power” and political conditions in every era…

    This is why “modern history” is ALWAYS the most lied about. This flies directly in the face of those who promote the most ridiculous idea according to which it is allegedly impossible to create a mass-mythology while millions of witnesses of history are still alive, who could so easily debunk it…

  5. germanusgott says:

    Great information that increases the amount of information disproving all the mainstream story about WWII.

    As with many things the information is out there but generally not consolidated in one place.

    I am positive that WWII was not just another event in history and we are discussing about it because is recent or our fathers and grandfathers lived those events but not only everyday we hear lies about Hitler, Nazis, etc. but just because the consequences of WWII helped to consolidate world power in the hands of a breed of psychopaths that are still in power with a destructive agenda for generations to come. And if we only have WWII consequences to discuss but we don’t just have that, what about 911?, 911 is worst in some ways to WWII because is in our faces with tons of elements to prove what it was thus these two “modern history” events are a change game for humanity.

    This is not the French Revolution and Napoleonic times which in many ways with the passing time and generations a new history corrected the views about Napoleon that of course during his times and years after was presented as a demonic figure by the victors.

  6. Netzband says:

    What A.Hitler said in the last quotes, was that Jews had taken over much of the shops, of the papers and finance in the republic of Weimar. There are the numbers that prove it. One (liberal) Jew nowadays, Raffael Seligmann also said, that it was a fact. “…na und? the Jews were more progressive, more clever and the Germans were backward. ” — one can translate that to: the Germans were holding on to other moral standards, while Jews took advantage of the misery after Versailles and they had fiancial connection, that allowed them to buy up businesses.

    Some numbers from the Weimar-times after Versailles:
    —Sir Arthur Bryant, a respected historian of the 1920s, wrote that although Jews comprised only 1% of the German population, in 1924 in the Reichstag they constituted a 25% of the Social Democrats.
    Jews controlled 57% of the metal trade, 22% of grain, and 39% of textiles. More than 50% of the Berlin Chamber of Commerce were Jewish, as were a spectacular 1,200 of the 1,474 members of the German Stock Exchange.
    Of the 29 legitimate theaters in Berlin, 23 had Jewish directors. Authorship was almost a Jewish monopoly. In 1931, of 144 film scripts worked, 119 were written by Jews and 77 produced by them.
    America – Facts Are Facts By Jonathan Silverman

    • Excellent Info Netzband! With regard to Weimar, the following video is also very much worth watching. It deals particularly with the decadence of Berlin, but also the poverty of the Germans, and how average women and children were prostituting themselves for hard currency as the German currency was worthless. WARNING: THIS VIDEO IS INTENDED FOR MATURE AUDIENCES ONLY!

      What is also important to note, however, is that after Hitler and the NS began to clean up Berlin, those Jews who basically had ran Berlin up to that point, headed straight for New York and Hollywood, where they started fomenting the atrocity stories, and “anti-NS” campaigns, while at the same time, also importing the Berlin culture onto the USA. They took over Hollywood at that point and through their movies, also subverted America.

      Rodney Martin discussed those issues recently on the Deanna Spingola show:
      [audio src="" /]

Comments are closed.