The United Nations is an international criminal organization, which is not concerned with world peace. It was created by and for the Bankster Gangsters. It was born out of a criminal conspiracy to wage and entirely unnecessary war against Germany. The FRG is the bastard child born of the inglorious victors: the ALL LIES! They did NOT “liberate” Germany! They reinstated the enslavement of 1919 on behalf of the International Bankster Gangsters and their NWO agenda. Americans, particular the elite types pride themselves on exporting “American Culture” to Germany. Who asked you for your degenerate so-called “culture”? We had our own wonderful history, language and culture and were in the process of cultivating it and trying to preserve it! We didn’t need your MacDonalds, Walmart and Hollyweird culture! Americans and Brits pride themselves on having given Germany “democracy”. Who asked you for it? Only that minority who had left Germany after 1933 when they could no longer have their way with Germany. Then, having succeeded in stirring up the world against us, beginning in 1933, and having instigating World War II in 1939, for the total destruction of Germany, this same bunch returned and restored the political cesspool called “democracy” and their “culture” which Germany had earlier liberated itself from.
The Americans and the Brits, and their lackies, the Canadians, Aussies, et al pride themselves on creating a “new Germany” in their own image, having given Germans “freedom”. Really? A country where you are not free to speak your mind, much less decide on your own form of government is NOT free. It is a concentration camp where the inhabitants are on day parole. And a country where the inhabitants are daily inundated with war propaganda, and the people are still chastised (domestically and abroad) with false history, shame and guilt is NOT FREE!
They speak of having “saved Germany (the FRG) from Communism”. Really? If you had been truly concerned with Bolshevik Communism and freedom throughout Europe from those mass-murderers, you should NEVER have sided with them and to fight Germany which always wanted PEACE, and said so consistently and had done everything in its power to achieve peace, security and justice for all …which is well documented! If you really want to be a friend to the Germans, then face the facts, tell the truth, and take responsibility!
“The relationship of Germany and the United Nations first began with World War II, with United Nations then being synonymous with the Allies of World War II, and Germany then being the Greater German Reich, a member of the Axis powers. With the war ending in the defeat of Germany, the country’s territory was divided amongst the victors, and what was to remain Germany was under Allied administration. In 1949, two new countries were created in these occupied territories: the Federal Republic of Germany in May, and the German Democratic Republic in October.”
The United Nations says….
UN CHAPTER XVII: TRANSITIONAL SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS
“Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under Article 42, the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow, 30 October 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.”
“Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.”
That is still in the UN charter today! But there is more ….
Historian Dr. Klaus Nordbruch, the author of “Bleeding Germany Dry” states:
“Neither the agreement of 12 September 1990 on the Vertrag zur Regelung aus Krieg und Besatzung entstandener Fragen (Treaty on the Regulation of Questions Relating to War and Occupation – amended version, also called the “Two Plus Four Treaty”) nor the agreement of 27 and 28 September 1990 on the Vertrag über die Beziehung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den Drei Mächten (Treaty Concerning the Relationship of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Three Powers — amended version), revoked the 1954 Agreement (Treaty for the Regulation of Questions Resulting from War and Occupation or Transitional Treaty) in its entirety. Point 1 specified that the Allied directives are suspended and no longer in force — with exception of what is specified in Point 3 (of the Transitional Treaty of 1954.)
This startling exception reads as follows: “… The following directives of the Transitional Treaty shall remain in effect, however:
“Part I: Article 1, Paragraph 1, Points 1 (’Procedure for rescinding or amending legal regulations’ as well as Paragraghs 3, 4 and 5; Article 2, Paragraph 1; Article 3, Paragraphs 2 and 3; Article 5, Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5; Article 7, Paragraph 1; Article 8;
Part III: Article 3, Paragraph 5, no. a of appendix; Article 6, Paragraph 3 of appendix
Part VI: Article 3, Paragraphs 1 and 3;
Part VII: Articles 1 and 2;
Part IX: Article 1;
Part X: Article 4.
This is by no means a complete list of all the significant and highly sensitive limitations on Germany’s sovereignty. In addition to these specific limitations, Point 4c of the agreement of September 1990 specifies that the suspensions of other parts of the Transitional Treaty as enumerated in Point 1 of the agreement “does not diminish the necessity for Germany’s continuing observance of certain other obligations.” How can anyone speak of a “suspension” of the Agreement of 1954 when the Agreement of 1990 specifies that the fundamental directives of 1954 remain in force? The Auswärtiges Amt (equivalent of the US State Department) explains that the Federal Republic is bound by the earlier “international obligations” with no resultant “diminution of the present full sovereignty of the Federal Republic.” Is such an explanation logically comprehensible?
Hans-Peter Thietz, a former representative in the last freely elected Volkskammer (People’s Chamber) of the German Democratic Republic and representative in the European Parliament, discusses this question at length in his treatment Souveräner Staat oder noch immer unter Besatzungsrecht? (Sovereign State or Still Under Occupation Law?), which is indespensible reading on the subject.
In order to explain the immense significance of the above mentioned treaties, we must specify here the directives that have remained in force. Part 1 of Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Transitional Treaty of 1954 reads as follows: “All laws and obligations that have been established or decreed through legislative measures, court orders or administrative directives of the Allied agencies are in force and shall remain in force in all respects under German law, regardless of whether they are in agreement with other legal directives that may be issued or determined. Without exception these (Allied) laws and obligations shall take precedence over legislative, court or administrative measures, as well as similar laws and obligations based on domestic German law or (subsequently) established or determined laws and obligations.” In view of this directive, it is very obvious that the basic directives of occupation law are still in effect.
In plain language, this article means that Allied occupation measures that were decreed for Germany under earlier occupation law continue in effect, regardless of whether they are compatible with present German policies and legal system. It means that in future as in the past, German policies must accommodate and adhere to Allied (American) occupation directives. The continuing applicability of the above quoted article, as well as other articles of the Transitional Treaty, proves that the Berlin Republic will continue to be subordinated to former occupation directives, whose duration is unlimited.
This sobering acknowledgment is further evidenced by an additional fact. Article 1 of Part Nine, which also continues in effect, reads as follows: “Unless provided for in the provisions of a peace agreement with Germany, no citizen of Germany who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic may raise any claims of any sort against the countries that signed the Declaration of the United Nations of 1 January 1942; or joined and supported it; or were at war with Germany; or are named in Article 5 of the 5th Part of this treaty.
Furthermore, no citizen of Germany who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic may raise any claims of any sort against the citizens of these countries on account of measures that were taken by the governments of these countries or under their authority during the period between 1 September 1939 and 5 June 1945, on account of the condition of war that existed in Europe. Furthermore, no one shall be allowed to make such claims before any court of the Federal Republic.”
http://www.nordbruch.org/speeches-essays-publications/political-foundations-federal-republic-germany (where you can also purchase the book)
And NOW you know WHY no allied leader or member of the Allied forces has ever been charged with war crimes, nor sued for damages and reparations, but the German people must pay, and pay, and pay…
IF YOU WANT TO FREE GERMANY, SPEAK THE TRUTH AND DEMAND JUSTICE! STOP THE LIES AND PROPAGANDA AND STOP CONDONING THEM! STOP GOING ALONG TO GET ALONG. TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. STOP USING THEIR HATEFUL TERMINOLOGY AND START CHALLENGING THOSE WHO PERPETUATE FALSEHOODS!
And that includes you Mr. Putin! Open the all the war archives !
WAHRHEIT MACHT FREI!