Debunking Anthony Migchels concerning NSDAP monetary policy and usury

germany freedomOn Tuesday, September 24th, 2013 Deanna Spingola interviewed Rodney Martin who debunked a Veterans Today article by Anthony Migchels entitled “Hitler’s Finances and the Myth of Nazi Anti-Usury Activism” which has been widely circulated on various alternative media sites within the “half-truth movement” to keep the kool-aid drinkers  sedated, dumbed down and dis-informed, and unable to see, much less accept the fact the Hitler and the NSDAP opposed the Bankster Gangsters and their system of usury, and that National Socialism was the solution to the New World Order agenda.

Who would not want the world to know that? Moreover, who would have a vested interest in keeping the so-called “truth movement” from accepting that fact, and keeping them perpetually demonizing Hitler and “evil Nazis”?  Who has a vested interest in keeping “truth seekers” going down rabbit holes that go nowhere?  It merely keeps certain “truther gurus” in a position to keep repeating their hysterical mantras, and to keep their reputations and fear mongering strategies afloat, which enables them to rake in cash from their books and DVDs etc, and no doubt, even more cash from their handlers. Who ultimately benefits? What agenda is served?

By the way, Anthony Migchels’ article is virtually un-sourced.  He merely adds some related links at the bottom and pretends that his diatribe is authoritative. About the only thing he sources is from the Jewish Virtual Library where they quote Schacht, as if they are not a biased source? Mr. Migchels apparently also believes in “Nazis”. There was never any such thing.  They exist only in the imagination and rantings of ignorant people who love to hate National Socialism and to bash people around who are no longer here to defend themselves. His use of that term speaks to his bias.

Download mp3


Points made by Rodney along with some of my own notes:

1. The author Anthony Migchels admits that he has NO DATA regarding interest rates (Usury) during the Hitler era. Thus, he debunks himself and admits he has no proof. Rodney states that

2. Hjalmar Schacht was a “Rothschild Baking agent”  who served two terms as head of the Reichsbank. One term during Weimar years and then again, because of his experience and connections was brought back by Hitler for an interim, transitional period until Hitler was able to put his own plan in place.  However, however, he was first appointed by Hitler as the Minister of Economics. Schacht was not an NSDAP party member.  He spoke perfect English, had spent a lot time in America,  had connections, was very egotistical and enjoyed having power and prestige, and to be in the limelight.  Thus, Hitler was able to use and manipulate him to make him useful and to act as a kind of firewall against the international bankers while Germany was being reorganized under the NSDAP.  Schacht was later removed when he was no longer useful to the NSDAP government and his services and connections were no longer needed.

3. Professor Gottfried Feder who wrote the book on National Socialist monetary and economic policy served as State Secretary in the Finance Ministry and in the number 2 position where exerted great influence.  Hermann Goering implemented the first 4 year plan in which the NSDAP govt moved towards self-sufficiency.

4. Migchels states  that Schacht oversaw the creation of IG Farben which is patently false, and furthermore, IG Farben was nothing sinister, but the name has been deliberately tainted in the post war years and used as a trigger to conjure mental images of the “holocaust” and an emotional state of repulsion. Migchels uses it like a pro to gain sympathy for his position.  IG Farben was an innovative company that developed, amongst other things, synthetic oil which assisted Germany to become self-sufficient and independent.  It was a spin-off from the old and well established BASF company. During Schacht’s first term as a President of the Reich’s Bank in the Weimar years, he approved the loan as “start up capital” for IG Farben which they needed, but he had no other involvement.  So again, this is just an emotional ploy in Migchels’ script.

5.  Schacht was replaced by Walther Funk, a protoge of Feder, who implemented the NSDAP plan.

6. Migchels states “there was no usury free economy”.  Rodney cites “Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933-1944” by Franz Leopold Neumann (Oxford Uni. Press, 1944) which details the barter system.

7. Migchels claims the classic lie that Germany’s recovery was based upon re-armament, how ever, that did not begin in earnest until 1936.  Rodney states that Hitler’s unprecedented mammoth Autobahn project was NOT financed with loans from the International Bankers, but by selling bonds and paying workers with Reichs Labour Treasury Certificates.  Rodney cites “The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy“, by Adam Tooze

Bottom Line Facts:

Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government.

Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.”

The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.

Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:

“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).

In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels.  Source:  How Hitler Defied the Bankers   (based on Web of Debt by Ellen Brown)

Quotes from Hjalmar Schacht:

“The German future lies in the hands of our Fuehrer”

“Instead of a weak and vacillating Government, a single, purposeful, energetic personality is ruling today.”

“The aim and the idea of the Four Year Plan were and remain entirely correct and necessary!”

“Only the closest collaborators of the Fuehrer know how difficult is the burden of this responsibility; how sorrowful are the hours during which decisions must be made which bear upon the well being and the fate of all of Germany.”

An American banker had once commented to him, “Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We’ve lots of money and that’s real banking.” Schacht replied, “You should come to Berlin. We don’t have money. That’s real banking.” (John Weitz, Hitler’s Banker, Warner Books, Great Britain: 1999)

“Germany can generally only pay if the Corridor and Upper Silesia will be handed back to Germany from Polish possession, and if besides somewhere on the earth colonial territory will be made available to Germany.”

“Allied supplies of arms to Russia, and the manpower reserves of Russia have been sufficient to bring continuous counter-attacks against our Eastern Front.”

Recommended Reading on this Topic:

Warwolves of the Iron Cross: The Hyenas of High Finance: The International Relationships of French and American High Finance (Book)


Founding and Funding of the NSDAP

Hitler and the Banksters: The Abolition of Interest-Servitude

Hitler’s Unforgivable Sin?

How Hitler Tackled Unemployment and Revived Germany’s Economy

The Myth of Fritz Thyssen and Big Business Funding Hitler and the NSDAP Exposed

Hitler was a Jew? A Rothschild?? Really ???

attack on Rothschilds

This entry was posted in Economics, financing, Germany, Hitler, Interviews, National Socialism, New World Order, NSDAP, Policies, Rothschild, World War II and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Debunking Anthony Migchels concerning NSDAP monetary policy and usury

  1. BMan says:

    I normally look to Anthony for usury related thinking. When I saw this diatribe, I felt something was amiss. It is way beyond his normal work and research (it is as if he didn’t study the subject at all).

    The “afterthoughts” he added were pure rehashed BS.

    It makes me wonder what or who got to him for such a radical change of heart.

    • sophiah8says says:

      Having posted there with facts from recognized sources and see ing the usual use of the same lies repeatedly I finally left that thread and here is what I posted after a couple of days of witnessing the boxed agenda there:

      ” Both Mike and Sophia are way too emotionally involved. Mike is endlessly regurgitating ..”

      no surprise in your accusing we who do post facts and sources of doing exactly what you are doing . there goes that tjb again.

      It has become difficult to find the posts that show up in email and to read your repeated REPEATED same old same old claims as facts is not worth attempting to debate and is boring
      you have worn out that pack of cards and are using greasy faded aces now.

      IF you really did research there are dozens of sites that wold support your views but they are ALL operated by those same old same old regurgitators of the lies you also regurgitate here endlessly. There are interesting facts thrown in you COULD use IF you really did research and not just post the same old same old

      Last night I realized your tactics are to repeat endlessly the same old same old because you dont know any other same olds to perk up your blather and you really are desperate to keep this huge thread going so you tag on the same old same old to try to breathe life into a horse that was dead and headed for the glue factory when you saw MAYBE you could get a nose or ear out of it before the chopper.
      There is no reason for me to assist with your puny oxygen shots into a now meaningless thread and my knowledge is far too valuable for this thread where you deny all but the same old same old that is so long disproven

      Shame on you for beating that dead horse
      The Revisionists, MANY of whom are National Socialists, have long since won any arguments you have presented here and some you claim to have presented and have not

      So before this dead horse stinks any more I bid you farewell and may you enjoy the environment in which you have chozen to dwell with your passel of chozen acolytes.

      Thanks for this as I did meet a couple of teriffic & knowlegeable folks here.



      • sophiah8says says:

        an aside here
        g+ usurped three of my gmail boxes since Wednesday and made all my stuff on a page for the world to see and messed up many connections . passwords and such
        Right now I think I have found all the invasive tech and realigned all but maybe some of my mail wont operate properly
        Also am TOTALLY blocked from posting in utube threads or on comments pages of like minded people.
        This only happened after I began to join in that thread and being a paranoid conspiracy theorist MAYBE that thread was set up to collect data and interfere with
        we of a certain philosophy
        Cant prove it but no reason I am suddenly blocked in utube connections just since being there…mmm…

  2. Butterkeks says:

    These Americans never disappoint with their “research”.

    Feder was already mentioned, he was the mastermind of economic policies.
    And (unfortunately), the Strasser brothers and influence on finacial and economic matters.

    Anyway, there even exists a book titled “Die Brechung der Zinsknechtschft”.(The breaking of interest slavery)
    It originated in 1919, and it was Feder and the DAP who founded the “Deutscher Kampfbund zur Brechung der Zinsknechtschaft”, and published the same year the mentioned manifesto,

    Kosher wikipedia can’t afford an english entry on that, obviously not even with usual spin .

    Additionally, especially film and movie theatres were used by NSDAP government to spread the truth.
    Films such as “Die Rothschilds-Aktien auf Waterloo”, the “Eternal Jew, or “Jud Süß” debunk the myth of Hitler being Rothschild affiliated. They financed the fake bankster opposition, the Marxists and Bolsheviks, dear Americans. These groups never have taken on the root problem, usury.

    It is also again worth mentioning, that the Rothschild site states, that their criminal and immoral banking syndicate was taken down by NSDAP.

    • kungfisse says:

      Thanks. Do you have a direct link for the Rotschild site stating that there banking syndicate was taken down by the NSDAP? Thanks in advance.

      • Butterkeks says:

        A simple google query for Rothschild would be sufficient.

        Anyway, for the lazy people. 🙂

        “The crash of 1929 brought problems, not least in Austria where Louis von Rothschild struggled hard to shore up the Creditanstalt, Austria’s largest bank, to prevent collapse. Less than a decade later a darker tide arrived; the Austrian Rothschilds’ interests were seized in 1938 by the Nazis, bringing to an end more than a century at the heart of middle European banking. In France and Austria, the family was scattered for the duration of the war. ”

        Not rocket science to get there, is it?

      • just get a copy of nial ferguson the rothschildes, its all recounted in their

  3. sophiah8says says:

    Some towns have been creating their own systems for years to divorce their survivla from the petro dollar
    Here is one of the oldest , there are MANY across America

    Ithaca Hours is a local currency system that promotes local economic strength and community self-reliance in ways which will support economic and social justice, ecology, community participation and human aspirations in and around Ithaca, New York. Ithaca Hours help to keep money local, building the Ithaca economy. It also builds community pride and connections. Over 900 participants publicly accept Ithaca HOURS for goods and services. Additionally some local employers and employees have agreed to pay or receive partial wages in Ithaca Hours, further continuing our goal of keeping money local.

    //www. ithacahours. org/

    its bills say
    ” In Ithace we trust” 🙂

    • Butterkeks says:

      Right, even before NSDAP time, eg the miracle of Wörgl with Freigeld Closely connected with Silvio Gesell.
      The experiment was ended by the traitorous Austrian government and central bank, under threat to use the military in 1933. It was the equivalent to traitorous Weimar government, installed by the same cabal after WWI.

      English wiki is thoroughly spread thin on that.

      • sophiah8says says:

        There was a beginning of all this usury slavery, in Cannan when the self chozen became wealthy on the heads of all the non chozen lands and goods they stoel and then slaughtered all those people, It has evolved to global tyranny

        “This whole Jewish world….a blood sucking people….a destructive parasite, this world is now at the disposal of Marx on the one hand and of Rothschild on the other. Authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralization of the state. And where there is centralization of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.” — Mikhail Bakunin [1814-1876]

  4. Butterkeks says:

    Wayne, I would like to use the change to point english speakers to the realities of devastating Weimar period.
    I feel, many english speakers don’t only have a clue about NSDAP, but even even less about Weimar.

    I know these stories from my grandparents, my grandpa still tells them if asked.
    I know how they went with a cart to the bakery to buy a loaf a bread, and how they used the million bills to heat the home. My grandpa said, even a cart full of paper money could buy sometime, because inflation was so fast, that the cart full of money wasn’t enough at arrival.
    I think it is important to draw an accurate picture of Weimar, because that is what has been hitting the US americans, and it all points to same catastrophic consequences, given Heli Ben continues the madness.

    Some photographs:

    20 billion marks…

    Nowadays, they just conceal the zeros on the debt notes.

  5. Amalek says:

    His posts on usury are pretty good, but he seems to have bought into the disinfo of the Jew Henry Makow.

    • I tried to comment something to you but the dude blocked me, I think the fact that there are so many works in german on the subject, particularly on exactly how it was done, that he felt stupid when I pointed that out, also he can not speak german and I pointed that out, not that Im the greatest but I know enough to prove other people are using google translator and also to translate das manifest zur brechung der zinsknechtshaft des geldes… look at the comments, he must have several accounts congratulating himself for nothing…

  6. Markus says:

    This usury topic is the most important one, imo, to get the Troofers closer to the truth.

    They know interest slavery is the root of all evil, and always say: “the Founders weren’t perfect (meaning they had slaves and got rid of Indians), but they understood the issuance of money”.

    Then the Jonesites say Gaddafi etc are no Angels, but were about to kick the bankers out.

    So, even if all the alleged German atrocities were true, they could be forgiven, just as the atrocities of the Founders or Gaddafi are forgiven bc they fought interest-slavery. if this is actually true, idk, but in case of the NSDAP, it is certainly evident).

  7. caperash says:

    I don’t have an axe to grind either way. The only thing I feel certain of is that most of the main narrative I received growing up is false. That said, it seems to me that the Money Power did very well in WW II, including those elements in the US which provided stuff for the Nazis (fuel, computers etc.). Just as the Money Power (as Migchels call them) were behind the horrific Jewish-Bolshevik overthrow and mass murder in Russia, so it seems that they were behind much of WW II. Now maybe Hitler was a lone hero fighting against this but I find that a bit hard to believe even if I am fairly sure that most of what has been written about him is false. In any case, the result of his leadership was the destruction of Germany, the mass murder and rape of tens of millions of Germans, half of Europe taken over by the Bolsheviks, the destruction of the British Empire and the cultural continuity with Christian Europe which it provided, along with the total elimination of the old Holy Roman Empire which the Austro-Germanic peoples embodied.

    If Hitler wasn’t involved with this, perhaps he was manipulated and/or people around him were agents, like the agents around Roosevelt (if he himself was not one).

    I guess all I am saying is that I doubt that Hitler was good and all the rest were bad just as I don’t accept that the Allies were all good and Hitler was all bad. My suspicion is that all these figures, like US Presidents today, are front men. They may have a certain amount of power and influence, but if they go too far against the Money Power, they will be stopped very quickly.

    I don’t know, but it would be really nice to get a more complete ‘insiders’ history’ of who was really pulling the strings back then. I do not buy Makow’s angle on this, but some of what he says raises questions which I for one find hard to answer or fully explain away.

    Reading Migchel’s piece I had the feeling – not for the first time – that he had to give the internationalists some things and allow them to keep operating within the national sphere of Germany, but also he had some real influence on the domestic front wherein he performed historic miracles which show the way forward today in many regards. So it’s a mixed bag, I suspect, not a simple either/or good/bad situation. As is so often the case in the real world.

    • “The Money Power did very well in WW II…” the money powers were doing just wonderfully in Weimar Germany too at the expense of the Germans (ie. the status quo).

      “Those elements in the US which provided stuff for the Nazis…” is bullshit straight from Anthony J. Sutton, who does NOT make his case. There is also no such thing as a “Nazi” as I have pointed out. Many in the so-called truth movement pretend that there was no Germany prior to Hitler and hence, no foreign investment. Germany did not start with Hitler. Germany was part of the global economy so their is nothing unusual about American companies having done business there for the sake of making money. That is what corporations try to do. Furthermore, after Hitler came to power, the worldwide boycotts against German goods and services began, and Germany had to barter with other nations as Rodney Martin indicated, as well as become very technically innovative to circumvent the boycotts and to become self-sufficient.

      “The Money Power were behind the horrific Jewish-Bolshevik overthrow and mass murder in Russia….” Of course they were, as it benefited them and it was part of their global agenda. It is provable and even admitted. There is NO PROOF that that Jews (International High Finance) financed Hitler. I provided a link which proves that they did not finance him. There was no guarantee that Hitler would ever achieve power either. Indeed, he could have easily been killed during the Munich Putsch. It took 13 years of blood, sweat and tears.

      “Maybe Hitler was a lone hero fighting against this but I find that a bit hard to believe …” You find that hard to believe? Maybe you need to spend a few days going through my older posts and the many links I have provided. And as said, ask yourself how did Hitler, Nationals Socialism and Germany benefit from all of this? What incentive would they have had to go through hell over 13 years to get elected deliberately and deceive the German people?

      “If Hitler wasn’t involved with this, perhaps he was manipulated and/or people around him were agents, like the agents around Roosevelt (if he himself was not one)….” That is your “conspiracy theory” mindset at work. Hitler’s struggle was against Bolshevism from the start. They were agitating in Germany which was on the brink of civil war and for the take over of all of Europe. THAT is who the “Money Power” was backing, along with those parties who tried to preserve the status quo. Hitler was even banned from speaking for quite some time. How would that help “Money Power” to get their man into power? Who stopped the spread of Bolshevism? Hitler! There were no doubt people with their own agendas around him and other who well into the war became traitors. That is not Hitler’s fault. He didn’t trust most of them. Furthermore, Hitler also did everything humanly possible to avoid war, while the allies did nothing but provoke. Hitler wanted peace, peace, peace and said so in dozens of speeches and the diplomatic records document all of his peace efforts. How would NO WAR have benefited the “Money Power”?

      “I guess all I am saying is that I doubt that Hitler was good and all the rest were bad…” Why? Because you can’t imagine anyone moral and courageous enough to stand up to them! By that thinking, anyone at all who attempts to stop their corruption and the enslavement of humanity is suspect and must be one of their agents. Very interesting. So, why not just go back to sleep and just accept the world as it is and that there is nothing anyone could ever do to stop them and to stop our enslavement?

      “It would be really nice to get a more complete ‘insiders history’ of who was really pulling the strings back then….” Hitler himself told us who were pulling the strings in the USA, England and France and he named them, their minions, and their organizations. He also banned the Freemasons and all other secret societies. How did that help the “Money Power” / NWO ?

      “I had the feeling that he had to give the internationalists some things and allow them to keep operating within the national sphere of Germany…”. Congrats to Migchels! Because that is exactly what he would have you think while providing no proof!

      I have nearly 180 posts now on these topics for you to read and I provided links (above) to a few of them. I have dozens of additional links on this site (in the right-hand column) which answer all of these things, plus my book store with many highly recommendable books on these topics.

      Rodney Martin’s website is also an extremely valuable source of very detailed information about the National Socialism and the Third Reich.

      Start reading, watch my videos, and then come back in a few weeks or months and let me know if you still feel the same way.

      Thank you!

      • caperash says:

        Thanks for your reply, although I find the tone over the top. Calm down. I am one of your subscribers brave enough to expose his identity on the computer as such and deserve better treatment! I find your objections to my contribution somewhat worthy but insufficiently detailed to be convincing. Nor do I expect more from comments. You also seem to have misunderstood the thrust of what I was trying to communicate but that’s okay.

        As to reading through all of your 180 posts, although I have read through quite a few, I am insufficiently interested to read through them all. This is not what I do for a living. (My immediate concern with these issues is that of someone whose son is German although I myself am not.)

        Despite your robust response, I remain unconvinced that even if Hitler himself was pure – and personally I tend to think he was but am too cynical these days to trust that instinct – there were many other forces at work. For example, in your reply, although taking me to task for being conspiracy-minded when mentioning that either Hitler or others around him were agents, you then go onto say – in rebuttal – “There were no doubt people with their own agendas around him and other who well into the war became traitors. That is not Hitler’s fault. He didn’t trust most of them.” Well, for me that is just another way of saying the same thing. Which is why I say I am unconvinced.

        I have read many things over the years but cannot recall most in any detail. However, I find there are many unanswered aspects to Hitler’s leadership, including the release of the British at Dunkirk, Hesse’s mission and silence, more especially the sudden reversal near Moscow and deflection to the oil areas (the deal with Standard Oil and German industrialist the details long ago forgotten – and btw I can’t recall a word of Sutton and don’t think I ever even finished his book(s) but again it’s a long while back that I looked at them). There were some massive failures under his watch along with stunning successes. The end result was an almost complete victory for the Money Powers.

        I repeat: maybe he was the lone good guy, it’s certainly possible, and if so he has my gratitude and respect. But I still find that hard to believe.

        I know that most of the projections about his being consummate evil, and the Nazis being the henchmen of Satan, and the grapho-manic mass murder narratives etc. are all hyberbolic cartoons, but that doesn’t mean that I necessarily believe that one side was all-good and the other all-bad either.

        In short, although I remain very much a support of your blog and its principal thrust to remove the unfair and unjust and hypocritical and indeed disgracefully unfair libels on the German people, I am not yet sure I truly understand what was going on back then. And I have the right to such an opinion and neither you nor anyone else can force me to see the way you seem to insist I should see.

        In fact, that sort of approach is usually the sign of weakness itself in that it indicates a desire to have others join in, to feel or think the same way because of a certain insecurity. You have no reason to be insecure. But if you believe you know all there is to know about that period, on all levels, I humbly suggest that I suspect that is not the case. I suspect the people involved at the very highest levels also were blind to many areas of the situation. For that is the nature of reality. Always. There is no single one truth for all, since truth is multi-dimensional, and each person has their own, and often quite different, version. Five people witnessing the same event have five different experiences of it, each equally valid. Nobody can encapsulate the first 45 years of European history into one single truth or view and impose it on everyone else. It simply doesn’t work.

        That said, if I didn’t want to learn more, I would keep coming to your blog to dip into the many informative pieces, most of which I find illuminating of the cultural and national aspects of Germany at the time if not of the international context which also interests me, but which of course is far more opaque.

        Keep up the good work!

      • caperash says:

        errata: for ‘the first 45 years of European history’ I meant: ‘the first 45 years of 20th century European history.’

      • Amalek says:

        Thanks. People seem to want to think that Hitler was some sort of double agent simply because Germany lost.

        They act as if Hitler and the Germans should have been able to defeat the Brits, Americans, and Russians if only Hitler wasn’t secretly a Rothschild/Jew/Jesuit/Satanist/banker/whatever. It’s a bit absurd. Germany did extremely well in the war considering what they were up against (pretty much the entire industrialized world), and I think that’s what makes the current order so terrified. The power of a people united is enough to take on the entire world.

      • Markus says:

        If I may say something regarding Standard Oil and IG Farben.

        IG Farben was basically bought up by/ merged with Standard Oil in the 1920’s, when the Reichsmark was hyperinflated and things could be bought for pennies on the dollar in Germany with hard currency from the US and a “democratic” (globalist) government.

        I believe Standard Oil appeased to IG Farben by not boycotting its demands for certain petroleum products, because Rockefeller feared he would lose his investment through nationalization of IG Farben if Standard Oil would be of no use to Germany.

        A limited supply of certain petroleum products in exchange for the patent rights of the leading chemistry think tank in the world was a small price to pay.

        It was calculation and if Standard Oil would have denied IG Farben the supply, the Germans would have come up with another revolutionary idea that would have made Standard Oil’s unholy alliance with IG Farben obsolete. Gas from Sand (Benzin aus Sand) for example was already patented.

        Just as Hitler faded out usury money over a period of time and not on January 31st, 1933 as first official action, solving the IG Farben-Standard Oil Question would have been solved rationally and accordingly to the circumstances. In the midst of war was certainly not the right point in time, and for Rockefeller, it was a lucrative business, supplying both sides.

        In the end, Standard Oil gained massive know-how, especially after the secret patents were stolen and brought to the US.

    • kungfisse says:

      “The Money Power” = Judaism

      • The “Money Power” is International-Judeo-Freemasonic-Freemasonic-Hyper-Capitalism and the flip side of that coin is International-Judeo-Freemasonic-Marxist-Bolshevism. Both are exploitative, corrosive and destructive systems. National Socialism and Fascism (similar but not the same) opposed both of the aforementioned. NS was truly “government of the people, by the people, for the people”. Everything was for the people. Hitler and the NSDAP were democratically elected. He truly represented their will and he served them and their interests. and not international interests. This is where the “Truthers” are very confused. They have been deliberately led astray by the likes of Icke, Jones, Rivero, et al right down the garden path to hell.

  8. RickB says:

    Thanks. Article was effectively debunked… and quite emphatically with Werner’s call. Awesome. No wonder the powers that be want to shut him up.

  9. Wayne, let us not forget hat Walther Funk was not only a protégé of Gottfried Feder but a co researcher and author of at least one of the Gottfried Feder works that I am translating. Walther Funk was a lot more involved in Gottfried Feder’s “die brechung der zinsknechtshaft” ideology than most people realize or want to admit

  10. Also, author Niall ferguson(Im sure there are more but he comes to mind first) has recounted in his books on the bauer aka rotschild’s family, that the estates and wealth of several of the parasitic banking family of jewish ethnicity – bauer rotschild – were confiscated by the nsDAP, I believe at least one bauer aka rotschild was even held in custody for some time… such pathetic propagandists they cant even make a good attempt at a believable lie!

  11. sophiah8says says:

    to consider pursuing

    In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:


    “Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

Comments are closed.