Several months ago, I published two articles and videos featuring the words of Frau Ursula Haverbeck, a brave, elderly German lady who lived in National Socialist Germany under Adolf Hitler and who had survived both the war and the aftermath. Based upon the now known facts, she had publicly challenged various departments of the FRG/BRD government as well as the council of Jews in Germany to explain where the so-called “Holocaust” of the Jews took place.
In April 2015, I became aware that Frau Haverbeck had also been interviewed on a German, mainstream, public television program called “Panorama” concerning her views, the facts she is aware of, and her motives. It was amazing for this to be broadcast to the general public in occupied Germany on ARD (national TV), with its Nuremberg inspired draconian laws concerning “holocaust denial”, “defaming the victims” and “inciting the public”. Moreover, this one hour long interview was, surprisingly, not particularly “hostile” either. It also would have reached a huge live TV audience.
At that time I first viewed it, it was only available in the German language. Now, however, thanks to an anonymous person’s hard work, very accurate English sub-titles have been added, and so I am very pleased to be able to present this to my readers, and to help raise greater awareness of this courageous lady and the issues she brings to the table.
NOTE: please click on the CC button at the bottom of the video frame to see the English subs.
Further to this, in a recent e-mail received from Prof. Robert Faurisson, he stated: “[the following] 10-page article provides information on an argument that is important for those who, like any revisionist researcher worthy of the name, care about historical EXACTITUDE.
In the case of the most ordinary of crimes, justice and police officials know that a forensic examination is absolutely indispensable. However, for seventy years, in the case of what is reputed to be the most atrocious crime ever by its nature and its proportions, that of “the Holocaust” or “the Shoah”, the judges have dispensed with any medico-legal study conducted under the rules established by law and observed by good judicial practice.
There has been just one exception: in France, a forensic examination of the alleged Nazi gas chamber in the Struthof camp near Strasbourg was ordered shortly after the war and assigned to Professor René Fabre, Dean of the Paris faculty of pharmacy and a toxicologist. On December 1, 1945 the professor came to a negative conclusion: he had found no traces of hydrocyanic acid where such traces ought to have been discovered, i.e. in the enclosure called “gas chamber” and in the exhaust stack of that enclosure; nor were there any such traces in the corpses left by the Germans at the University of Strasbourg’s institute of anatomy, corpses of Jews alleged to have been gassed by the camp commandant, Josef Kramer, alone, without the assistance of a single gas specialist. Lacking any training in chemistry, J. Kramer was, in civilian life, a simple accountant! The report by Professor Fabre has vanished but I personally discovered, in 1980, a document certifying the results of his study. Even Jean-Claude Pressac admitted that Fabre’s findings were negative:
“The result [of toxicological testing for traces of cyanide] at Struthof was negative, which was somewhat embarrassing” (The Struthof Album, Edited by Serge Klarsfeld, [published by] The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, New York, 1985, p. 12).” ”
You may read the full 10 page article here: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.ca/2014/12/in-seventy-years-no-forensic-study.html